Plane 0 · Infrastructure
CoreX Stack deployment, provider boundaries and runtime infrastructure
Retain as infrastructure/deployment layer; do not expose placeholder hardware/security claims.
This catalogue reconciles the earlier CoreX planes, consoles and solution catalogue against the modern Living Trust build. Synthetic metrics and unsupported readiness/compliance claims are deliberately excluded.
CoreX Stack deployment, provider boundaries and runtime infrastructure
Retain as infrastructure/deployment layer; do not expose placeholder hardware/security claims.
Service identity, integration channels, deployment topology and provider connectivity
Reframe around channels, service identity and deployment topology.
Living Trust Kernel + Trust Fabric policy
Now materially implemented through canonical objects, lifecycle, authority preservation and policy evaluation.
CoreX Defender / Security Posture / state-evidence consistency
Reconcile legacy Defender concepts onto current event, Watch and risk infrastructure; do not revive unsupported cloak/AV claims.
CoreX Identity & Authenticity + Credentials
Identity assurance is implemented; biometric/device/media providers remain externally gated.
Canonical event spine + Living Trust timeline + Audit & Activity
Current event infrastructure is stronger than the legacy design.
Credential/event persistence + Evidence Vault + retention policy
Persistence exists; private Evidence Vault requires storage/KMS/retention binding.
Execution territory, region, jurisdiction policy and sovereign deployment
Keep territory as a governance dimension rather than a product.
Explainable Trust Intelligence + CoreX Defender
Deterministic/explainable signals are current; probabilistic AI claims require evidence and validated models.
Trust Fabric, verifier policy, entitlements and release governance
Unify mature current policy primitives in Studio.
Product lines, vertical trust profiles and deployable solution packs
Use reusable product/vertical profiles rather than separate trust cores.
Preserve verified-attribute/provider UX; replace opaque verification score with explainable assurance dimensions.
Reuse biometric UX only for platform authenticators. CoreX should never receive raw fingerprint templates. Remove unsupported FIDO2 certification wording.
Current identity service contains email one-time-code primitives; production delivery/provider/session hardening remains before GA.
Reuse UX when an SMS/phone provider and abuse controls are actually bound.
Provider buttons should be rendered only from actually configured federation providers.
Console choice must not confer authority; platform access is derived from trusted role/tenant/policy claims after authentication.
Organisation access is tenant/role/policy controlled after authentication.
Modern holder workspace already provides identity, access, credentials, transactions, events, evidence and sharing.
Provider contracts are the correct home; biometric models do not become CoreX source authority.
OIDC service identity is active; customer IdP federation is deployment-specific.
Expose through assurance policy; authenticator execution remains with bound providers.
Legacy fingerprint UX is a design reference; current repo evidence does not show a complete WebAuthn implementation.
Recover breach/phishing/headers/DNS/IP posture UX only where actual providers/checkers are implemented.
VECTOR contains compliance screening, release and evidence primitives.
Use the modern canonical event spine rather than legacy in-memory audit.
No current full scanner engine is evidenced; restore individual checks only with truthful providers/results.
Legacy rules can be reconciled onto Watch, risk signals and canonical events.
Payment assurance and transaction trust, not acquiring/custody/settlement.
Current repos do not evidence a production investment-management product.
Integration/API/Webhook concepts now belong in the Developer Platform.
Do not claim AML/sanctions capability until providers and compliance operations are bound.
No current production loyalty engine is evidenced; preserve programme UX as a future vertical.
Compatible with Product Trust/provenance if authoritative registry/source integrations exist.
May compose with VECTOR promotions; no current referral engine evidenced.
Keep outside the trust kernel.
Modern Studio subsumes the central management console.
Pricing economics, offers, packages and commercial control-plane primitives already exist in VECTOR.
Current APIs are live; a separate gateway product is not yet required.
Current adapters/reference profiles include VC, OpenID foundations, EPCIS, UDI and related standards.
Reconcile tenant, role, assurance, disclosure, entitlement and release-class controls into one Studio access model.
Current Verify is broader than the legacy KYC-only positioning.
Use for channel/deployment readiness; do not claim a distributed edge-security runtime until evidenced.
Internal client patterns exist; public SDK extraction/package publication remains productisation work.
Developer catalogue is production-deployed; OpenAPI publication is the next step.
Side-effect-free CoreX sandbox is live; VECTOR provides additional shadow validation.
Signed lifecycle/webhook paths exist; source ingress can remain externally gated.
Use actual event/reporting data only.
Predictive/ML claims require validated models and telemetry.
VECTOR reporting/evidence foundations already exist.
Preserve UX idea; no current production community platform evidenced.
Retain only if future product strategy requires it.
Not part of the current trust platform baseline.